Cabecera 2019 CBMSO CSIC UAM

Sunday, 15th September 2019
    MICROSCOPÍA ÓPTICA Y CONFOCAL
 

Coordinador Científico:
Fco. Javier Díez-Guerra
Responsable Técnico:
Ángeles Muñoz

 

Microscopía Óptica y Confocal

 

SMOC

 

Comunidad de Madrid

 

ÚLTIMAS NOTICIAS

HORARIO SMOC de 9:30-17:00 (desde el 16 de Septiembre al 17 de Octubre) 

CONFOCAL MULTIFOTÓN: Está instalada una platina manual por lo que no se puedes hacer "TileScan" ni posiciones. Consultar para in vivos con el personal del SMOC. (28-08-19)

CONFCAL META: El escáner no funciona correctamente. Equipo fuera de servicio. (25-07-19)

 

ENLACES - REACTIVOS Y FLUORÓFOROS - PROTEÍNAS FLUORESCENTES - ARTÍCULOS - ARTÍCULOS DESDE 2009

 

  • Enlaces a revisiones sobre proteínas fluorescentes (Zeiss)
  • McKinney, et al. (2009). A bright and photostable photoconvertible fluorescent protein. Nature Methods. 6, 131-133.
  • Subach, et al. (2009). Monomeric fluorescent timers that change color from blue to red report on cellular trafficking. Nature Chemical Biology. 5, 118-126.
  • Subach, et al. (2009). Photoactivatable mCherry for high-resolution two-color fluorescence microscopy. Nature Methods. 6, 153-159.
  • Nowotschin, et al. (2009). Live-imaging fluorescent proteins in mouse embryos: multi-dimensional, multi-spectral perspectives. Trends in Biotechnology. 27, 266-276.
  • Kremers, et al. (2009). Photoconversion in orange and red fluorescent proteins. Nature Methods 6, 355 - 358.
  • Ilya Kelmanson. (2009). Enhanced red and far-red fluorescent proteins for in vivo imaging. Nature Methods, 6, 355-358.
  • Tomosugi, et al. (2009). An ultramarine fluorescent protein with increased photostability and pH insensitivity. Nature Methods. 6, 351 - 353.
  • Jin Zhang. (2009). The Colorful Journey of Green Fluorescent Protein. ACS Chem. Biol. 4, 85–88.
  • Davidson and Campbell. (2009). Engineered fluorescent proteins: innovations and applications. Nature Methods. 6, 713-717.
  • J. Lippincott-Schwartz and G. H. Patterson. (2009). Photoactivatable fluorescent proteins for diffraction-limited and super-resolution imaging. Trends in Cell Biology. 19, 555-565.
  • E. L. Snapp. (2009). Fluorescent proteins: a cell biologist's user guide. Trends in Cell Biology. 19, 649-655.
  • Bogdanov, et al. (2009). Cell culture medium affects GFP photostability: a solution. Nature Methods 6, 859-860.
  • Goedhart, et al. (2010). Bright cyan fluorescent protein variants identified by fluorescence lifetime screening. Nature Methods. 7, 137-139.
  • Piatkevich and Verkhusha. (2010). Advances in engineering of fluorescent proteins and photoactivatable proteins with red emission. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 14, 23-29.
  • Subach, et al. (2010). Bright Monomeric Photoactivatable Red Fluorescent Protein for Two-Color Super-Resolution sptPALM of Live Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6481–6491.
  • Maurel, et al. (2010). Photoactivatable and Photoconvertible Fluorescent Probes for Protein Labeling. ACS Chem. Biol. 5, 507–516.
  • Kodama and Hu. (2010). An improved bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay with a high signal-to-noise ratio. BioTechniques. 5, 793–805.
  • Kaddoum, et al. (2010). One-step split GFP staining for sensitive protein detection and localization in mammalian cells. BioTechniques. 4, 727–736.
  • Shcherbo, et al. (2010). Near-Infrared fluorescente proteins. Nature Methods. 7, 827–829.
  • Chudakov, et al. (2010). Fluorescent proteins and their applications in imaging living cells and tissues. Physiological reviews. 90, 1103-1163.
  • Drobizhev, et al. (2011). Two-photon absorption properties of fluorescent proteins. Nature Methods. 8, 393-399.
  • Wiedenmann, et al. (2011). From EosFP to mIrisFP: structure-based development of advanced photoactivatable marker proteins of the GFP-family. J. Biophotonics. 4, 377-90.
  • Patterson, G. (2011). Photoactivation and Imaging of Optical Highlighter Fluorescent Proteins. Current Protocols in Cytometry. 57:12.23.1–12.23.12.
  • Kremers, et al. (2011). Fluorescence proteins at a glance. J. Cell Science. 124, 157-160.
  • Hansen and Atlung. (2011). YGFP: a spectral variant of GFP. BioTechniques, 50, 411–412.
  • Miyawaki, A. (2011). Proteins on the move: insights gained from fluorescent protein technologies. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 12, 656-668.
  • Markwardt, et al. (2011). An improved ceruelan fluorescent ptotein with enhanced brightness and reduced reversible photoswitching. PLoS One. 6:e17896.
  • Olesya, et al. (2011). Modern fluorescent proteins: from chromophore formation to novel intracellular applications. Biotechniques. 51, 313-327.
  • Ohashi, et al. (2012). Visualization of cofilin-actin and Ras-Raf interactions by bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays using a new pair of split Venus fragments. Biotechniques, 52, 45-50.
  • Goedhart, et al. (2012). Structure-guided evolution of cyan fluorescent proteins towards a quantum yield of 93%. Nature Communications. 3, 751.
  • Zhang, et al. (2012). Rational design of true monomeric and bright photoactivable fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods. 9, 727-729.
  • Methods in Enzymology. 2012. Volume 505, Pages 2-523.
  • Methods in Enzymology. 2012. Volume 506, Pages 2-490.
  • Hao, et al. (1012). Manipulation of cellular light from green fluorescent protein by a femtosecond laser. Nature Photonics. 6, 651-656.
  • Kodama and Hu. (2012). Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC): A 5-year update and future perspectives. Biotechniques. 53, 285-298.
  • Shcherbakova and Verkhusha. (2013). Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging. Nature Methods. 10, 751-754.
  • Ozawa et al. (2013). Advances in Fluorescence and Bioluminscence Imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 85, 590-609.
  • Shaner, et al. (2013). A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nature Methods. 10, 407-409.
  • Tiwary and Nagai. (2013). Smart fluorescent proteins: Innovation for barrier-free superresolution imaging in living cells. Development, Growth and Differentiation. 55, 491-507.
  • Mérola, et al. (2014). Newly engineered cyan fluorescent proteins with enhanced performances for live cell FRET imaging. Biotechnology J. 9, 180-191.
  • Durisic, et al. (2014). Singel molecule evaluation of fluorescent protein photoactivation efficiency using an in vivo nanotemplate. Naturem Methods. 11, 156-162.
  • Sengupta, et al. (2014). Superresolution Imaging of Biological Systems using Photoactivated Localization Microscopy. Chemical Reviews. 114, 3189-3202.
  • Nienhaus and Nienhaus. (2014). Fluorescent proteins for live-cell imaging with superresolution. Chemical Society Reviews. 43, 1088-1106.
  • Dean and Palmer. (2014). Advances in fluorescence labelling strategies for dynamic cellular imaging. Nature Chemical Biology. 10, 512-523.
  • Chu, et al. (2014). Non-invasive intravital imaging of cellular differentiation with a bright red-excitable fluorescent protein. Nature Methods. 11, 572-578.
  • Yu, et al. (2015). A naturally monomeric infrared fluorescent protein for protein labeling in vivo. Nat. Methods. 12, 763-765.
  • Sttarzadeh, et al. (2015). Green to red photoconversion of GFP for protein tracking in vivo. Scientific Reports, 5. Article number: 11771. 

 

NOTE! This site uses cookies and similar technologies.

If you not change browser settings, you agree to it. Learn more

I understand

COOKIES POLICY

What are cookies?

A cookie is a file that is downloaded to your computer when you access certain web pages. Cookies allow a web page, among other things, to store and retrieve information about the browsing habits of a user or their equipment and, depending on the information they contain and the way they use their equipment, they can be used to recognize the user.

Types of cookies

Classification of cookies is made according to a series of categories. However, it is necessary to take into account that the same cookie can be included in more than one category.

  1. Cookies according to the entity that manages them

    Depending on the entity that manages the computer or domain from which the cookies are sent and treat the data obtained, we can distinguish:

    • Own cookies: those that are sent to the user's terminal equipment from a computer or domain managed by the editor itself and from which the service requested by the user is provided.
    • Third party cookies: those that are sent to the user's terminal equipment from a computer or domain that is not managed by the publisher, but by another entity that processes the data obtained through the cookies. When cookies are installed from a computer or domain managed by the publisher itself, but the information collected through them is managed by a third party, they cannot be considered as own cookies.

  2. Cookies according to the period of time they remain activated

    Depending on the length of time that they remain activated in the terminal equipment, we can distinguish:

    • Session cookies: type of cookies designed to collect and store data while the user accesses a web page. They are usually used to store information that only is kept to provide the service requested by the user on a single occasion (e.g. a list of products purchased).
    • Persistent cookies: type of cookies in which the data is still stored in the terminal and can be accessed and processed during a period defined by the person responsible for the cookie, which can range from a few minutes to several years.

  3. Cookies according to their purpose

    Depending on the purpose for which the data obtained through cookies are processed, we can distinguish between:

    • Technical cookies: those that allow the user to navigate through a web page, platform or application and the use of different options or services that exist in it, such as controlling traffic and data communication, identifying the session, access to restricted access parts, remember the elements that make up an order, perform the purchase process of an order, make a registration or participation in an event, use security elements during navigation, store content for the broadcast videos or sound or share content through social networks.
    • Personalization cookies: those that allow the user to access the service with some predefined general characteristics based on a series of criteria in the user's terminal, such as the language, the type of browser through which the user accesses the service, the regional configuration from where you access the service, etc.
    • Analytical cookies: those that allow the person responsible for them to monitor and analyse the behaviour of the users of the websites to which they are linked. The information collected through this type of cookies is used in the measurement of the activity of the websites, applications or platforms, and for the elaboration of navigation profiles of the users of said sites, applications and platforms, in order to introduce improvements in the analysis of the data of use made by the users of the service.

Cookies used on our website

The CBMSO website uses Google Analytics. Google Analytics is a simple and easy to use tool that helps website owners to measure how users interact with the content of the site. You can consult more information about the cookies used by Google Analitycs in this link.

Acceptance of the Cookies Policy

The CBMSO assumes that you accept the use of cookies if you continue browsing, considering that it is a conscious and positive action from which the user's consent is inferred. In this regard, you are previously informed that such behaviour will be interpreted that you accept the installation and use of cookies.

Knowing this information, it is possible to carry out the following actions:

How to modify the configuration of cookies

Using your browser you can restrict, block or delete cookies from any web page. In each browser the process is different, here we show you links on this particular of the most used browsers: